keep your friends close but your enemies closer



Yes she can!

Just team her with Evita Kerry and Viola.


Comments (Page 4)
6 PagesFirst 2 3 4 5 6 
on Apr 17, 2008
Voting for a republican is a vote to destroy the country, its a vote to destroy the constitution. Bush has committed treason on MULTIPLE times when he has violated the constitution. By definition, supporting the commission of treason makes you guilty of that same treason.What? Now your diseased little microbrain has you convinced that Voting for a candidate is treason? Again, you commit a federal crime here. One more, and I will report it to FBI internet crimes.


All I have done is post my own opinion on this political forum. That's all, nothing else. BTW there is no federal libel law.
on Apr 17, 2008
Voting for a republican is a vote to destroy the country, its a vote to destroy the constitution. Bush has committed treason on MULTIPLE times when he has violated the constitution. By definition, supporting the commission of treason makes you guilty of that same treason.What? Now your diseased little microbrain has you convinced that Voting for a candidate is treason? Again, you commit a federal crime here. One more, and I will report it to FBI internet crimes.


Why do you have a problem with someone stating their opinion? I'm not a judge or jury nor do I condone acting as such, I simply stating my views as I see them.

on Apr 17, 2008
Careful - he will sue you for definition of character - after all, they got all the tort lawyers.He'd have to have some charachter to defame.


Well that and unlike some people I am capable of debating issues without having to threaten lawsuits.
on Apr 17, 2008
I am capable of debating issues


Debate 101: Present Facts.

You have not yet. WHich may or may not indicate you can debate, but definitely shows that you do not know how.
on Apr 17, 2008
Debate 101: Present Facts.


The fist step is just because you refuse to comprehend the facts doesn't invalidate those facts. Lets see you try to disprove the claims I have made rather than ignore them.

You already tried claiming that Republicans working on Republican Actor Fred Thompsons campaign for president doesn't prove republicans tried to get an actor elected president.

Then you tried claiming Roger ailes working for republican campaigns and a republican white house doesn't prove he was a republican political operative.

Are you that serial?
on Apr 17, 2008
Politico:
All I have done is post my own opinion on this political forum. That's all, nothing else. BTW there is no federal libel law.


Wrong again Bucko! The "Sullivan Decision" from the U.S. Supreme Court. Libel is also illegal in all U.S. states. Even if there were no Supreme Court decision, your libel was committed on the internet. Internet crime is a federal offense.

But all that aside, why do you want to be a scummy liar? You know that voting for a candidate is not treason, so quit insisting it is. That or admit that you just hate anyone who thinks differently than you do, and can't stand the fact that you aren't the only one with rights.

Either way, I don't see much respect for freedom or the U.S. from you.

on Apr 17, 2008
The "Sullivan Decision" from the U.S. Supreme Court. Libel is also illegal in all U.S. states. Even if there were no Supreme Court decision, your libel was committed on the internet. Internet crime is a federal offense.


Precisely...
on Apr 17, 2008
Wrong again Bucko!


So you deny that the opinion is my own?

Libel is also illegal in all U.S. states.


Doesn't make it a federal crime.

your libel was committed on the internet.



My libel wasn't committed at all, you simply argued that it was a federal crime for me to have an opinion you didn't like.

why do you want to be a scummy liar?


Who said I wanted to be a republican?

That or admit that you just hate anyone who thinks differently than you


Says the person who called me a "scummy liar".

I don't see much respect for freedom or the U.S. from you.


I don't see any sign of independent thought from you. But we both have our opinions now, don't we. The only difference is I can debate the issues without threatening lawsuits. You apparently lack that ability.

on Apr 17, 2008
Doesn't make it a federal crime.


Idiot, yes it does.

My libel wasn't committed at all, you simply argued that it was a federal crime for me to have an opinion you didn't like.


No, there you go, lying again. I never said your opinion is a federal crime. I said your libel against me and other Republicans is a federal crime. You accuse me and other Repubicans of treason, that is a capital crime. If you can't back up your accusations, that is called Libel.

You then proved your worthlessness by saying that voting for a presidential candidate is treason.

Says the person who called me a "scummy liar".


Right, I didn't call everyone I disagree with a "scummy liar", in fact, the only person I was refering to in that statement is YOU. Now, you might not be "scummy", that is simply my opinion of you. But you lied, so you are a liar.

I don't see any sign of independent thought from you. But we both have our opinions now, don't we. The only difference is I can debate the issues without threatening lawsuits. You apparently lack that ability.


I never once threatened a lawsuit. Show me where I threatened to sue you.

What I did was tell you that if you libelled me again, I would report it to FBI internet crimes.

Get your facts straight!

Yes, we both have different opinions, and that's a good thing.
on Apr 17, 2008
I thought Libel was a tort... it's a crime too?
on Apr 17, 2008
I thought Libel was a tort... it's a crime too?


Yes. Unfortunately stupidity is not.
on Apr 17, 2008
stupidity is not.


So thats why you aren't in prison.
on Apr 17, 2008
The_Politico

I specifically requested that you present facts to back up your absurd statements and you failed, even avoided, doing doing so. Based upon this I must conclude that your statement is nothing more than hyperbole and rhetoric which of course means that you have no basis at all upon which to make any sort of reasonable and intelligent argument. I can only conclude that you lack anything even remotely resembling intellectual honesty therefore you aren't worthy of any sort of intelligent attention at all.
on Apr 18, 2008
The_PoliticoI specifically requested that you present facts to back up your absurd statements and you failed, even avoided, doing doing so. Based upon this I must conclude that your statement is nothing more than hyperbole and rhetoric which of course means that you have no basis at all upon which to make any sort of reasonable and intelligent argument. I can only conclude that you lack anything even remotely resembling intellectual honesty therefore you aren't worthy of any sort of intelligent attention at all.


Good lord you truly are as stupid as you look. I have made no "absurd" statements. At least not "absurd" as in untrue, perhaps "absurd" as in "George Bush finds the concept of having morals 'absurd'".
on Apr 18, 2008
Good lord you truly are as stupid as you look.


Liar
6 PagesFirst 2 3 4 5 6