keep your friends close but your enemies closer
Published on October 9, 2008 By Anthony R In Internet

Just recently, San Cho posted this Photoshop picture of Sarah Palin in a KKK uniform in the comment section of my blog.

-

I personally condemn the picture and I can't find any humor in it.  My question is simple. Does anyone else condemn this?

And who supports it? I have joked around with photoshop pictures before, but I have never put anyone in a Hitler or KKK uniform because that goes beyond being a joke and crosses over into the realms of full blown hate speech.

 


Comments (Page 14)
23 PagesFirst 12 13 14 15 16  Last
on Nov 02, 2008

Ah, but forensics aren't always reliable and, on occasion, have been proven wrong.

Honest, Starkers. It appeared on MSNBC (hardly supportive of her). There's enough 'wrong' with her candidacy without that. The truth is that the sounds heard weren't those hateful words when analyzed.

As for the yellow snow issue, and the moose that are terror stricken....that's fact and can't be ignored by any discerning voter!

on Nov 02, 2008

Honest, Starkers. It appeared on MSNBC (hardly supportive of her). There's enough 'wrong' with her candidacy without that. The truth is that the sounds heard weren't those hateful words when analyzed.

Yeah, I know... but I just couldn't let a chance go by to take another tongue in cheek pot shot at her, now could I!

As for the yellow snow issue, and the moose that are terror stricken....that's fact and can't be ignored by any discerning voter

I read somewhere that Sarah Palin is a "devout Christian and an avid hunter"... and to see that in the one sentence, to me, is a contradiction in terms.  I am not a devout anything (religiously), but I still believe it to be un-Christian/un-Godly to kill animals purely for sport.  In fact, it's not even a sport... the poor animals are defenceless and can't shoot back, thus it is a needless and shameful slaughter of God's creatures... which makes Sarah Palin a hypocrite in the first degree.

on Nov 02, 2008

I read somewhere that Sarah Palin is a "devout Christian and an avid hunter"... and to see that in the one sentence, to me, is a contradiction in terms. I am not a devout anything (religiously), but I still believe it to be un-Christian/un-Godly to kill animals purely for sport. In fact, it's not even a sport... the poor animals are defenceless and can't shoot back, thus it is a needless and shameful slaughter of God's creatures... which makes Sarah Palin a hypocrite in the first degree.

If I could award 1,000 karma points on that one, I would. <----- New symbol for 1K karma points.

I wonder if those great gun and hunting enthusiasts would be so enthusiastic if the amimals could shoot back?

on Nov 02, 2008

I read somewhere that Sarah Palin is a "devout Christian and an avid hunter"... and to see that in the one sentence, to me, is a contradiction in terms. I am not a devout anything (religiously), but I still believe it to be un-Christian/un-Godly to kill animals purely for sport. In fact, it's not even a sport... the poor animals are defenceless and can't shoot back, thus it is a needless and shameful slaughter of God's creatures... which makes Sarah Palin a hypocrite in the first degree.

Let me ask you something.

Are you a vegetarian or do you eat meat that somebody else kills for you so that you never ever see the poor animals die?

Do you believe that it is hypocritical to kill an animal and eat it while it is not hypocritical to buy a dead animal and eat it without ever seeing it die?

 

on Nov 02, 2008

Do you believe that it is hypocritical to kill an animal and eat it while it is not hypocritical to buy a dead animal and eat it without ever seeing it die?

To kill animals for food is one thing...but to kill them because you have deemed them a problem after moving into they're territory is bad enough AND proposing a $150.00 bounty on the front left foreleg for every one you kill is just plain sick. That woman disgusts me.

on Nov 02, 2008

To kill animals for food is one thing...but to kill them because you have deemed them a problem after moving into they're territory is bad enough AND proposing a $150.00 bounty on the front left foreleg for every one you kill is just plain sick. That woman disgusts me.

We put a 'bounty' on cattle.  You're righteous, but only up to a point.  And you're not willing to accept that some folks might have a different opinion than you - they 'disgust' you.  And we really believe that BO is going to bring folks like you & Palin 'Together'?

on Nov 02, 2008

Well my view on this is that hunting is fine, as long as animal that was killed have a real use.

 

Killing deer just for its 5 point alters? NO. For beef for next 2 months AND those fore-mentioned alters? Just fine with me. ( I think I used wrong word... alters? )

on Nov 02, 2008

Let me ask you something.

Are you a vegetarian or do you eat meat that somebody else kills for you so that you never ever see the poor animals die?

It is completely beside the point to confuse meat eating for nourishment/nutrition with butchering animals purely for trophies and nothing more.  I've seen documentaries where hunters have killed wild animals, taken the antlers, tusks or head, etc, and left the rest there to rot, which is a barbaric waste and far from being civilized.... much less Christian.  On the other hand, there is little or no waste with domestic animals that are bred for their meat and humanely slaughtered by qualified butchers.

And no, I am not squirmish.  I have no problem with seeing an animal butchered for its meat and other bi-products... I have witnessed and participated in this more than once.  I do, however, have a problems with trophy hunters who kill indicriminately, which is why I can not stand Sarah Palin, who professes to be a devout Christian on one hand, while needlessly shooting moose on the other... with commercial abatoirs producing enough meat products from domesticated animals bred for the purpose, there is absolutely NO NEED for Palin to go out MURDERING moose... PERIOD.

on Nov 03, 2008

We put a 'bounty' on cattle. You're righteous, but only up to a point. And you're not willing to accept that some folks might have a different opinion than you - they 'disgust' you. And we really believe that BO is going to bring folks like you & Palin 'Together'?

Ah...no. I never have and never would put a bounty of any kind on any animal. And to say that people disgust me because they have a different opinion is just plain silly. It's not the opinion....its the behavior and reasoning for it I find offensive. And I don't know who this "we" is...but I doubt they could bring me together with someone like Sarah Palin...not unless it includes an airplane and her running for her life...I could use a new table leg...might be a bit wobbly though.

on Nov 03, 2008

It's not the opinion....its the behavior and reasoning for it I find offensive

Right on there, WG... there is no acceptable reason for hunting defenseless wild animals purely for trophies... the 'so-called' pleasure and satisfaction of it.  I mean, what pleasure/satisfaction could one derive from senselessly killing a wild animal!!! 

So whatever happened to wildlife consevation and protecting endangered species... they're all endangered species when twits with guns go out to senselessly murder them

And what's worse, it's these hypocrites who condemn the killing of domesticated cats and dogs for 'so-called' sport or their fur... kill one of their hunting dogs and that's murder in the first degree.  Can't see the difference myself, both are unnecessary killing.

And I don't know who this "we" is...but I doubt they could bring me together with someone like Sarah Palin

Me either... she'd have you bankrupt and starving in no time, with her $200.000k plus penchant for new clothes and lipstick... and she managed to spend all that in less than 4 months.  I know that with such a voracious spending appetite, I'd rather be keeping her for 0,00001 of a second than a day.  Sheesh, just imagine the billions she'd spend on redecorating the White House if she manages to get there... not to mention the new wardrobe for herself, her family and the entire White House staff so everyone is in keeping with her sense of dress... which of course would be more important than real life issues.

on Nov 03, 2008

starkers

Let me ask you something.

Are you a vegetarian or do you eat meat that somebody else kills for you so that you never ever see the poor animals die?


It is completely beside the point to confuse meat eating for nourishment/nutrition with butchering animals purely for trophies and nothing more.  I've seen documentaries where hunters have killed wild animals, taken the antlers, tusks or head, etc, and left the rest there to rot, which is a barbaric waste and far from being civilized.... much less Christian.  On the other hand, there is little or no waste with domestic animals that are bred for their meat and humanely slaughtered by qualified butchers.

And no, I am not squirmish.  I have no problem with seeing an animal butchered for its meat and other bi-products... I have witnessed and participated in this more than once.  I do, however, have a problems with trophy hunters who kill indicriminately, which is why I can not stand Sarah Palin, who professes to be a devout Christian on one hand, while needlessly shooting moose on the other... with commercial abatoirs producing enough meat products from domesticated animals bred for the purpose, there is absolutely NO NEED for Palin to go out MURDERING moose... PERIOD.

 

Indeed. When I eat a steak or hamburger, I know it come from something that used to go 'moo'. I'm a realist on that respect. It would be rather hard for me to actually kill any animal, even for food, but I have no illusions on source of meat, unlike some people apperently...

on Nov 03, 2008

It is completely beside the point to confuse meat eating for nourishment/nutrition with butchering animals purely for trophies and nothing more.  I've seen documentaries where hunters have killed wild animals, taken the antlers, tusks or head, etc, and left the rest there to rot, which is a barbaric waste and far from being civilized.... much less Christian.

And I take it that you have decided that Mrs. Palin hunts animals purely for trophies? And you have even seen documentaries of people who do that?

Wow.

 

I have no problem with seeing an animal butchered for its meat and other bi-products... I have witnessed and participated in this more than once.  I do, however, have a problems with trophy hunters who kill indicriminately, which is why I can not stand Sarah Palin, who professes to be a devout Christian on one hand, while needlessly shooting moose on the other...

So Mrs. Palin kills "indiscriminately" and shoots moose? You think she shot the moose by accident?

And you have no problem with seeing an animal butchered but if someone shoots a moose it is needless?

 

 

on Nov 03, 2008

but I have no illusions on source of meat, unlike some people apparently...


That would be the people who eat meat but condemn those who kill animals?

 

on Nov 03, 2008

Killing deer just for its 5 point alters? NO. For beef for next 2 months AND those fore-mentioned alters? Just fine with me. ( I think I used wrong word... alters? )

'antlers', Rolf.... Spell checker ...

on Nov 03, 2008

Killing deer just for its 5 point alters? NO. For beef for next 2 months AND those fore-mentioned alters? Just fine with me. ( I think I used wrong word... alters? )

Deer is Venison.  And it is Antlers.(close).  But I agree with you.  And with very few exceptions, the meat is not wasted (that is not always the case, but most hunters are more fauna friendly than the average vegan).

I personally do not look at hunting as  "sport", but as long as they utilize the meat, I see no problem with it.

It is completely beside the point to confuse meat eating for nourishment/nutrition with butchering animals purely for trophies and nothing more.

The problem is you dont know what you are talking about.  Not all Hunters are looking for just trophies (and thus waste the meat).  But you seem to assume the worse, when there is no evidence to back up your bias.

Me either... she'd have you bankrupt and starving in no time, with her $200.000k plus penchant for new clothes and lipstick...

She has no penchant.  But your bias (or misogyny) is showing strongly.  That wardrobe was purchased for the campaign, not on a whim.  It would be more honest of you to just admit your bias and state outright you dont like her because of the spin put on, than to flail around trying to justify the hatred using half truths and lies to do so.

23 PagesFirst 12 13 14 15 16  Last